Volkswagen Polo 1997 vs Opel Astra 1998

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volkswagen Polo
1997 - 2000
Opel Astra
1998 - 2004
Body: Estate car / wagonHatchback
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.4 - 1.91.2 - 2.2

Performance

Power: 60 - 100 HP65 - 147 HP
Torque: 116 - 140 NM110 - 280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.9 - 16.9 seconds8.8 - 17 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.1 - 9.14.6 - 9.3
On average, the Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Opel Astra. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.14 m4.11 m
Width: 1.64 m1.71 m
Height: 1.43 m1.42 m
Volkswagen Polo is 3 cm longer than the Opel Astra, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 390 litres370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1250 litres1180 litres
Volkswagen Polo has 20 litres more trunk space than the Opel Astra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 70 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Opel Astra.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`545~ 1`661
Safety:
Quality:
above average

average
Average price (€): 10001000
Rating in user reviews: 7.0/10 7.5/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Opel Astra has
  • higher safety
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv