Volkswagen Polo 1997 vs Skoda Felicia 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Volkswagen Polo is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Skoda Felicia is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.9 | 1.3 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 100 HP | 55 - 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 - 140 NM | 99 - 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 - 16.9 seconds | 13 - 17.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 9.1 | 5.8 - 6.9 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Felicia. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Felicia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo is 10 cm shorter than the Skoda Felicia, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Skoda Felicia, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`545 | ~ 838 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Skoda Felicia has
| |