Volkswagen Polo 1997 vs Seat Cordoba 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Volkswagen Polo is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Seat Cordoba is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.9 | 1.4 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 100 HP | 60 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 - 140 NM | 116 - 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 - 16.9 seconds | 10.6 - 16.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 9.1 | 5.0 - 7.9 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Seat Cordoba. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo and Seat Cordoba are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Seat Cordoba, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`545 | ~ 850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Seat Cordoba has
| |