Volkswagen Polo 1997 vs Renault Clio 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.9 | 1.1 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 100 HP | 60 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 - 140 NM | 93 - 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 - 16.9 seconds | 9.6 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 9.1 | 4.2 - 7.4 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo is 33 cm longer than the Renault Clio, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volkswagen Polo has 120 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. This could mean that the Volkswagen Polo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`545 | ~ 1`495 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Renault Clio has
| |