Volkswagen Polo 2000 vs Toyota Corolla 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.9 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 100 HP | 90 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 - 145 NM | 130 - 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 - 17.3 seconds | 10.2 - 12.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.6 | 5.9 - 7.9 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Corolla. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller. Volkswagen Polo is 24 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`545 | ~ 1`225 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |