Volkswagen Polo 2000 vs Renault Megane 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.4 - 1.9 | 1.4 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 - 100 HP | 65 - 115 HP | |
Torque: | 116 - 145 NM | 114 - 200 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 - 17.3 seconds | 9.5 - 18.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.6 | 5.4 - 7.7 | |
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Megane. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.14 m | 4.44 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.42 m | |
Volkswagen Polo is smaller, but slightly higher. Volkswagen Polo is 30 cm shorter than the Renault Megane, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 485 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | 1600 litres | |
Renault Megane has more luggage space. Volkswagen Polo has 95 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Megane (by 350 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Volkswagen Polo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`545 | ~ 1`724 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | above average | average | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Renault Megane has
| |