Volkswagen Polo 2000 vs Volkswagen Bora 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Volkswagen Polo is available only with front wheel drive, while Volkswagen Bora can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.9 | 1.4 - 2.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 100 HP | 68 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 - 145 NM | 128 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 - 17.3 seconds | 7.4 - 18 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.6 | 5.0 - 11.0 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Bora. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Bora. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller, but slightly higher. Volkswagen Polo is 24 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Bora, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | 785 litres | |
| Volkswagen Polo has 65 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Bora. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 465 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Bora. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`545 | ~ 1`840 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Volkswagen Bora has
| |