Volkswagen Polo 2000 vs Seat Cordoba 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.9 | 1.4 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 100 HP | 60 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 - 145 NM | 116 - 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 - 17.3 seconds | 10.7 - 17.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.6 | 4.9 - 8.4 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Seat Cordoba. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.42 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm shorter than the Seat Cordoba, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`545 | ~ 925 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Seat Cordoba has
| |