Volkswagen Polo 1994 vs Volkswagen Polo 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.9 | 1.0 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 45 - 100 HP | 50 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 76 - 135 NM | 86 - 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 21.4 seconds | 8.7 - 18.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 8.6 | 4.4 - 7.5 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo 1994 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo 1999. On average, Volkswagen Polo 1994 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo 1999. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo 1994 is 2 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo 1999, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
975 litres | 975 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo 1994 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo 1999, which means Volkswagen Polo 1994 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`401 | ~ 1`416 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |