Volkswagen Polo 1994 vs Volkswagen Fox 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Volkswagen Polo is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Volkswagen Fox is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.9 | 1.2 - 1.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 45 - 100 HP | 55 - 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 76 - 135 NM | 106 - 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 21.4 seconds | 13 - 18 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 8.6 | 4.9 - 6.7 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Fox. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.54 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo is 11 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Fox, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
975 litres | 1016 litres | |
| Volkswagen Polo has 15 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Fox. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Fox (by 41 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Fox. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`401 | ~ 1`523 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Volkswagen Fox has
| |