Volkswagen Polo 1994 vs Renault Clio 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.9 | 1.1 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 45 - 100 HP | 60 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 76 - 135 NM | 93 - 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 21.4 seconds | 9.6 - 15.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 8.6 | 5.2 - 7.6 | |
|
On average, the Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Renault Clio. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo is 5 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
975 litres | 1035 litres | |
| Volkswagen Polo has 10 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 60 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Renault Clio, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`401 | ~ 1`498 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 6.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Renault Clio has
| |