Volkswagen Polo 1994 vs Peugeot 106 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.9 | 1.0 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 45 - 100 HP | 50 - 118 HP | |
| Torque: | 76 - 135 NM | 74 - 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 21.4 seconds | 8.7 - 19.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 8.6 | 5.3 - 8.8 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 106. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 106. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.59 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is larger. Volkswagen Polo is 4 cm longer than the Peugeot 106, 7 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
975 litres | 953 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Polo has 30 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 106. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 22 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Peugeot 106. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`401 | ~ 1`328 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
| |