Volkswagen Polo 1994 vs Honda Jazz 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel) | 1.2 - 1.3 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 45 - 100 HP | 78 - 83 HP | |
| Torque: | 76 - 135 NM | 110 - 119 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 21.4 seconds | 12.9 - 14.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 8.6 | 5.5 - 5.8 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Jazz. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller. Volkswagen Polo is 12 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
975 litres | 1323 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Volkswagen Polo has 135 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 348 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 1 metres more than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`401 | ~ 1`465 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |