Volkswagen Polo 1999 vs Volkswagen Lupo 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.9 | 1.0 - 1.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 - 125 HP | 50 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 - 195 NM | 86 - 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 18.4 seconds | 8.5 - 17.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 7.5 | 3.0 - 7.5 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Lupo. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.74 m | 3.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo is 21 cm longer than the Volkswagen Lupo, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 130 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
975 litres | 860 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Polo has 115 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Lupo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 115 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`416 | ~ 1`368 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Volkswagen Lupo has
| |