Volkswagen Polo 1999 vs Skoda Fabia 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.9 | 1.0 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 - 125 HP | 50 - 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 - 195 NM | 84 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 18.4 seconds | 9.6 - 20.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 7.5 | 4.5 - 7.8 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Skoda Fabia. On average, a Volkswagen Polo with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Skoda Fabia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.74 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller. Volkswagen Polo is 22 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
975 litres | 1016 litres | |
| Volkswagen Polo has 15 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 41 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`416 kg | ~ 1`579 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 987 kg | ~ 1`086 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 429 kg | ~ 493 kg | |
| Volkswagen Polo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem less than Skoda Fabia. Therefore, Skoda Fabia is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |