Volkswagen Polo 1999 vs Skoda Fabia 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.9 | 1.0 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 - 125 HP | 50 - 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 - 195 NM | 84 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 18.4 seconds | 9.6 - 20.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 7.5 | 4.5 - 7.8 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Skoda Fabia. On average, a Volkswagen Polo with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Skoda Fabia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.74 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller. Volkswagen Polo is 22 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
975 litres | 1016 litres | |
| Volkswagen Polo has 15 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 41 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`416 | ~ 1`579 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |