Volkswagen Polo 1999 vs Volkswagen Passat 2005

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volkswagen Polo
1999 - 2001
Volkswagen Passat
2005 - 2010
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Volkswagen Polo is available only with front wheel drive, while Volkswagen Passat can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.0 - 1.91.4 - 3.2

Performance

Power: 50 - 125 HP102 - 250 HP
Torque: 86 - 195 NM148 - 350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.7 - 18.4 seconds6.9 - 13 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.4 - 7.55.6 - 9.8
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Passat. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.74 m4.76 m
Width: 1.63 m1.82 m
Height: 1.42 m1.47 m
Volkswagen Polo is smaller.
Volkswagen Polo is 102 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Passat, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 245 litres565 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
975 litresno data
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage space.
Volkswagen Polo has 320 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Passat, which means Volkswagen Polo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`416~ 2`060
Safety:
Quality:
above average

average
Average price (€): 10002200
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Volkswagen Passat has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv