Volkswagen Polo 1999 vs Renault Clio 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.9 | 1.1 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 - 125 HP | 60 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 - 195 NM | 93 - 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 18.4 seconds | 9.6 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 7.5 | 4.2 - 7.4 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.74 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo is 7 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
975 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Volkswagen Polo has 265 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`416 | ~ 1`495 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Renault Clio has
| |