Volkswagen Polo 1999 vs Renault Clio 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.9 | 1.1 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 - 125 HP | 60 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 - 195 NM | 93 - 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 18.4 seconds | 9.6 - 15 seconds | |
| In general, Renault Clio are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Volkswagen Polo. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 7.5 | 4.2 - 7.4 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.74 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo is 7 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
975 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Volkswagen Polo has 265 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`416 kg | ~ 1`495 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 987 kg | ~ 950 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 429 kg | ~ 545 kg | |
| Volkswagen Polo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 27 procentiem less than Renault Clio. Therefore, Renault Clio is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Renault Clio has
| |