Volkswagen Polo 2001 vs Citroen C3 2002

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volkswagen Polo
2001 - 2005
Citroen C3
2002 - 2005
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 - 1.91.1 - 1.6

Performance

Power: 55 - 100 HP61 - 110 HP
Torque: 106 - 240 NM94 - 200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 - 17.5 seconds10.7 - 17.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.5 - 7.44.2 - 7.1
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C3. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.90 m3.85 m
Width: 1.65 m1.67 m
Height: 1.46 m1.52 m
Volkswagen Polo is 5 cm longer than the Citroen C3, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 270 litres305 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1030 litres1150 litres
Citroen C3 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Volkswagen Polo has 35 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C3. This could mean that the Volkswagen Polo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C3 (by 120 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Citroen C3.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`530~ 1`502
Safety:
Quality:
average

below average
Average price (€): 12001200
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • fewer faults
Citroen C3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv