Volkswagen Polo 2001 vs Citroen C3 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.2 - 1.9 | 1.1 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 55 - 100 HP | 61 - 110 HP | |
Torque: | 106 - 240 NM | 94 - 200 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 17.5 seconds | 10.7 - 17.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 7.4 | 4.2 - 7.1 | |
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C3. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.90 m | 3.85 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.67 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.52 m | |
Volkswagen Polo is 5 cm longer than the Citroen C3, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 305 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 1150 litres | |
Citroen C3 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volkswagen Polo has 35 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C3. This could mean that the Volkswagen Polo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C3 (by 120 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Citroen C3. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`530 | ~ 1`502 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Citroen C3 has
| |