Volkswagen Polo 2001 vs Audi A2 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.9 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 - 100 HP | 61 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 106 - 240 NM | 126 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 17.5 seconds | 9.8 - 14.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 7.4 | 2.9 - 5.9 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi A2. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A2. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.55 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo is 7 cm longer than the Audi A2, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 1085 litres | |
|
Audi A2 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volkswagen Polo has 120 litres less trunk space than the Audi A2. This could mean that the Volkswagen Polo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A2 (by 55 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Audi A2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`530 | ~ 1`452 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Audi A2 has
| |