Volkswagen Polo 2005 vs Toyota Corolla 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.9 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 - 150 HP | 90 - 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 - 310 NM | 130 - 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 17.5 seconds | 6.8 - 14.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 7.8 | 4.8 - 9.0 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Corolla. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller. Volkswagen Polo is 27 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 310 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Corolla has more luggage space. Volkswagen Polo has 40 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Corolla. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`663 | ~ 1`238 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |