Volkswagen Polo 2005 vs Volkswagen Fox 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Volkswagen Polo is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Volkswagen Fox is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.9 | 1.2 - 1.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 - 150 HP | 55 - 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 - 310 NM | 106 - 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 17.5 seconds | 13 - 18 seconds | |
| In general, Volkswagen Polo are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Volkswagen Fox. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 7.8 | 4.9 - 6.7 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Fox. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.54 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo is 9 cm longer than the Volkswagen Fox, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1030 litres | 1016 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Fox, which means Volkswagen Polo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`663 kg | ~ 1`523 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`102 kg | ~ 1`032 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 561 kg | ~ 491 kg | |
| Volkswagen Polo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem more than Volkswagen Fox. Therefore, Volkswagen Polo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Volkswagen Fox has
| |