Volkswagen Polo 2009 vs Skoda Fabia 2010

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volkswagen Polo
2009 - 2014
Skoda Fabia
2010 - 2015
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 - 1.61.2 - 1.6

Performance

Power: 60 - 105 HP60 - 180 HP
Torque: 108 - 230 NM108 - 250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.4 - 16.1 seconds7.3 - 16.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.2 - 5.93.8 - 7.5
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Skoda Fabia. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.97 m4.00 m
Width: 1.68 m1.64 m
Height: 1.49 m1.50 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo is 3 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 280 litres315 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
952 litresno data
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space.
Volkswagen Polo has 35 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`570~ 1`626
Safety:
Volkswagen Polo is better rated in child safety tests.
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 42003600
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • higher children safety
  • fewer faults
Skoda Fabia has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv