Volkswagen Polo 2009 vs Ford Fiesta 2012

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volkswagen Polo
2009 - 2014
Ford Fiesta
2012 - 2017
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 - 1.61.0 - 1.6

Performance

Power: 60 - 105 HP65 - 125 HP
Torque: 108 - 230 NM150 - 200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.4 - 16.1 seconds9.4 - 16.8 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.2 - 5.93.3 - 5.9
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Fiesta. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.97 m3.95 m
Width: 1.68 m1.72 m
Height: 1.49 m1.48 m
Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm longer than the Ford Fiesta, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 280 litres295 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
952 litresno data
Despite its longer length, Volkswagen Polo has 15 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. This could mean that the Volkswagen Polo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Fiesta, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`570~ 1`506
Safety:
Ford Fiesta scores higher in safety tests.
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 42005200
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Ford Fiesta has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv