Volkswagen Polo 2009 vs Ford Fiesta 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.0 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 - 105 HP | 65 - 125 HP | |
Torque: | 108 - 230 NM | 150 - 200 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 - 16.1 seconds | 9.4 - 16.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 5.9 | 3.3 - 5.9 | |
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Fiesta. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.97 m | 3.95 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.49 m | 1.48 m | |
Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm longer than the Ford Fiesta, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 295 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | no data | |
Despite its longer length, Volkswagen Polo has 15 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. This could mean that the Volkswagen Polo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Fiesta, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`570 | ~ 1`506 | |
Safety: | |||
Ford Fiesta scores higher in safety tests. | |||
Quality: | average | average | |
Average price (€): | 4000 | 4600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |