Volkswagen Polo 2009 vs Suzuki Splash 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | 1.0 - 1.2 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 105 HP | 68 - 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 - 230 NM | 90 - 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 - 16.1 seconds | 12 - 14.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 5.9 | 4.7 - 5.7 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Splash. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 3.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is larger, but lower. Volkswagen Polo is 20 cm longer than the Suzuki Splash, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 202 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | 573 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Polo has 78 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Splash. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 379 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 1.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Splash, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`570 | ~ 1`485 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Suzuki Splash has
| |