Volkswagen Polo 2009 vs Seat Ibiza 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 - 105 HP | 70 - 150 HP | |
Torque: | 108 - 230 NM | 112 - 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 - 16.1 seconds | 7.8 - 15 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 5.9 | 3.4 - 6.6 | |
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Seat Ibiza. On average, a Volkswagen Polo with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Seat Ibiza. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.97 m | 4.05 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.49 m | 1.44 m | |
Volkswagen Polo is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen Polo is 8 cm shorter than the Seat Ibiza, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 292 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | 938 litres | |
Volkswagen Polo has 12 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ibiza. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 14 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Seat Ibiza. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`570 | ~ 1`604 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 4000 | 3200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |