Volkswagen Polo 2014 vs Skoda Fabia 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.4 | 1.0 - 1.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 150 HP | 60 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 - 250 NM | 95 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 14.3 seconds | 9.4 - 15.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 - 4.9 | 3.4 - 4.8 | |
|
On average, the Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Skoda Fabia. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller. Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | 1150 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Volkswagen Polo has 50 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 198 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`634 | ~ 1`585 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |