Volkswagen Lupo 1998 vs Volkswagen Polo 2001

 
Volkswagen Lupo
1998 - 2005
Volkswagen Polo
2001 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.7 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 60 HP64 HP
Torque: 115 NM125 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.8 seconds17 seconds
Volkswagen Lupo engine produces 4 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Despite less power, Volkswagen Lupo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.44.7
Real fuel consumption: 4.7 l/100km5.0 l/100km
The Volkswagen Lupo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Lupo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Lupo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Lupo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
Fuel tank capacity: 34 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle950 km in combined cycle
940 km on highway1150 km on highway
720 km with real consumption900 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.53 m3.90 m
Width: 1.64 m1.65 m
Height: 1.46 m1.46 m
Volkswagen Lupo is smaller.
Volkswagen Lupo is 37 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 130 litres270 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
860 litres1030 litres
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage space.
Volkswagen Lupo has 140 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 170 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.1 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Lupo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Volkswagen Lupo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4301`630
Safety:
Quality:
above average

below average
Volkswagen Lupo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volkswagen Lupo, so Volkswagen Lupo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 12001200
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Lupo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Volkswagen Polo has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv