Volkswagen Lupo 1998 vs Seat Arosa 1998
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 HP | 60 HP | |
Torque: | 115 NM | 115 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.8 seconds | 16.8 seconds | |
Volkswagen Lupo and Seat Arosa have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.4 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 34 litres | 35 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
940 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
720 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 560'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.53 m | 3.54 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Lupo is 1 cm shorter than the Seat Arosa, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 130 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
860 litres | 790 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.1 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`430 | 1`445 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Volkswagen Lupo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Arosa has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Lupo, so Volkswagen Lupo quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Lupo has
|
Seat Arosa has
| |