Volkswagen Lupo 1998 vs Peugeot 107 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 54 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 NM | 130 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.8 seconds | 15.6 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 107 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Lupo engine produces 6 HP more power than Peugeot 107, but torque is 15 NM less than Peugeot 107. Despite the higher power, Volkswagen Lupo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.7 l/100km | 4.1 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 107 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Lupo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 107, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Lupo could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Lupo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 107. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 34 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 107 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Lupo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Seat Arosa | Used also on Citroen C1 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Volkswagen Lupo 1998 1.7 engine: The engine is not very powerful or dynamic, but it is robust. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.53 m | 3.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Volkswagen Lupo is larger, but slightly lower. Volkswagen Lupo is 10 cm longer than the Peugeot 107, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Lupo is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
860 litres | 751 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 9.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Lupo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Peugeot 107, which means Volkswagen Lupo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`430 kg | 1`245 kg | |
| Net weight: | 980 kg | 890 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 450 kg | 355 kg | |
| Volkswagen Lupo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem more than Peugeot 107. Therefore, Volkswagen Lupo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Peugeot 107 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Lupo has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Peugeot 107, so Peugeot 107 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Lupo has
|
Peugeot 107 has
| |