Volkswagen Lupo 1998 vs Fiat Panda 2007

 
Volkswagen Lupo
1998 - 2005
Fiat Panda
2007 - 2012
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.7 Diesel1.3 Diesel

Performance

Power: 60 HP70 HP
Torque: 115 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.8 seconds13 seconds
Fiat Panda is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Lupo engine produces 10 HP less power than Fiat Panda, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Fiat Panda. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Lupo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.44.3
Real fuel consumption: 4.7 l/100km5.2 l/100km
The Volkswagen Lupo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Volkswagen Lupo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Panda, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Lupo could require 15 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Lupo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Panda.
Fuel tank capacity: 34 litres35 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle810 km in combined cycle
720 km with real consumption670 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Volkswagen Lupo 1998 1.7 engine: The engine is not very powerful or dynamic, but it is robust.

Dimensions

Length: 3.53 m3.54 m
Width: 1.64 m1.58 m
Height: 1.46 m1.54 m
Volkswagen Lupo is 1 cm shorter than the Fiat Panda, 6 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Lupo is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 130 litres206 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
860 litresno data
Fiat Panda has more luggage space.
Volkswagen Lupo has 76 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Panda.
Turning diameter: 10.1 meters9.1 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Lupo is 1 metres more than that of the Fiat Panda, which means Volkswagen Lupo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`430900
Safety:
Quality:
above average

above average
Fiat Panda has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Lupo has serious deffects in 355 percent more cases than Fiat Panda, so Fiat Panda quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 10002600
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Lupo has
  • higher safety
  • lower price
Fiat Panda has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv