Volkswagen Lupo 2002 vs Peugeot 107 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Volkswagen Lupo) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Peugeot 107) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 54 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 NM | 130 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 15.6 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Lupo is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Lupo engine produces 71 HP more power than Peugeot 107, whereas torque is 22 NM more than Peugeot 107. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Lupo reaches 100 km/h speed 7.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 4.1 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 107 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Lupo consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 107, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Lupo could require 480 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Lupo consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 107. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 34 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 460 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 450 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 107 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.53 m | 3.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Volkswagen Lupo is larger, but slightly lower. Volkswagen Lupo is 10 cm longer than the Peugeot 107, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Lupo is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
830 litres | 751 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Lupo is 0.9 metres more than that of the Peugeot 107, which means Volkswagen Lupo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`320 kg | 1`245 kg | |
| Net weight: | 980 kg | 890 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 340 kg | 355 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Peugeot 107 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Lupo has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Peugeot 107, so Peugeot 107 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Lupo has
|
Peugeot 107 has
| |