Volkswagen Lupo 1999 vs Seat Arosa 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Lupo and Seat Arosa have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 34 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.53 m | 3.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Lupo is 1 cm shorter than the Seat Arosa, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 130 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 790 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Lupo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Seat Arosa. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`450 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Volkswagen Lupo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Arosa has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Lupo, so Volkswagen Lupo quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Lupo has
|
Seat Arosa has
| |