Volkswagen Lupo 1999 vs Toyota Aygo 2005

 
Volkswagen Lupo
1999 - 2005
Toyota Aygo
2005 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 100 HP68 HP
Torque: 126 NM93 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10 seconds14.2 seconds
Volkswagen Lupo is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Lupo engine produces 32 HP more power than Toyota Aygo, whereas torque is 33 NM more than Toyota Aygo. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Lupo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.63.8
Real fuel consumption: 7.1 l/100km5.4 l/100km
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Lupo consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Lupo could require 420 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Lupo consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo.
Fuel tank capacity: 34 litres35 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 510 km in combined cycle920 km in combined cycle
660 km on highway1020 km on highway
470 km with real consumption640 km with real consumption
Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.53 m3.41 m
Width: 1.64 m1.62 m
Height: 1.46 m1.46 m
Volkswagen Lupo is larger.
Volkswagen Lupo is 12 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 130 litres139 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
830 litres751 litres
Despite its longer length, Volkswagen Lupo has 9 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. This could mean that the Volkswagen Lupo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Lupo (by 79 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters9.4 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Lupo is 0.8 metres more than that of the Toyota Aygo, which means Volkswagen Lupo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4001`160
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Toyota Aygo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Lupo has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Toyota Aygo, so Toyota Aygo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 12002000
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Lupo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Toyota Aygo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv