Volkswagen Lupo 1998 vs Volkswagen Fox 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 126 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 13 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Lupo and Volkswagen Fox have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Lupo torque is 2 NM more than Volkswagen Fox. Volkswagen Lupo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Fox is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Lupo consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Lupo could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Lupo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 34 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 450 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 580 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 450 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Fox gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Volkswagen Lupo 1998 1.4 engine: Engine is known for its simplicity, compact design, and overall reliability. Many complaints from owners are related to power loss or fluctuating idle, often caused by issues with the throttle body, EGR valve, or air leaks ... More about Volkswagen Lupo 1998 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.53 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Volkswagen Lupo is smaller. Volkswagen Lupo is 30 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Fox, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Lupo is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 1016 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Fox has more luggage space. Volkswagen Lupo has 130 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Fox. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Fox (by 186 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Lupo is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Fox, which means Volkswagen Lupo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`390 | 1`520 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Volkswagen Fox has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Lupo has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Volkswagen Fox, so Volkswagen Fox quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Lupo has
|
Volkswagen Fox has
| |