Volkswagen Lupo 2001 vs Toyota Aygo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
|
Toyota Aygo is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Lupo engine produces 8 HP less power than Toyota Aygo, but torque is 23 NM more than Toyota Aygo. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Lupo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 3.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Lupo consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Lupo could require 360 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Lupo consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 34 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 500 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Toyota Aygo 2005 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.53 m | 3.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Volkswagen Lupo is larger. Volkswagen Lupo is 12 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 751 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Volkswagen Lupo has 9 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. This could mean that the Volkswagen Lupo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Lupo (by 79 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Lupo is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota Aygo, which means Volkswagen Lupo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`380 | 1`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Toyota Aygo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Lupo has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Toyota Aygo, so Toyota Aygo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Lupo has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |