Volkswagen Lupo 1999 vs Volkswagen Polo 2001

 
Volkswagen Lupo
1999 - 2005
Volkswagen Polo
2001 - 2005
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.2 Diesel1.4 Diesel

Performance

Power: 61 HP75 HP
Torque: 140 NM195 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.5 seconds13.6 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Lupo engine produces 14 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Lupo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.04.5
Real fuel consumption: 4.0 l/100km5.2 l/100km
The Volkswagen Lupo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Lupo consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Lupo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Lupo consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
Fuel tank capacity: 34 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1130 km in combined cycle1000 km in combined cycle
1250 km on highway1120 km on highway
850 km with real consumption860 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 3.53 m3.90 m
Width: 1.62 m1.65 m
Height: 1.46 m1.46 m
Volkswagen Lupo is smaller.
Volkswagen Lupo is 37 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 130 litres245 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
830 litres975 litres
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage space.
Volkswagen Lupo has 115 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 145 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Lupo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo.
Gross weight (kg): 1`2101`550
Safety:
Quality:
above average

below average
Volkswagen Lupo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volkswagen Lupo, so Volkswagen Lupo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 12001400
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Lupo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Volkswagen Polo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv