Volkswagen Lupo 1999 vs Volkswagen Fox 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 61 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 15 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Lupo engine produces 9 HP less power than Volkswagen Fox, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Volkswagen Fox. Despite less power, Volkswagen Lupo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.0 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.0 l/100km | 5.0 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Lupo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Lupo consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Lupo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Lupo consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 34 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.53 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Volkswagen Lupo is smaller. Volkswagen Lupo is 30 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Fox, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Lupo is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 1016 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Fox has more luggage space. Volkswagen Lupo has 130 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Fox. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Fox (by 186 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Lupo is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Fox, which means Volkswagen Lupo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`210 | 1`570 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Volkswagen Fox has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Lupo has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Volkswagen Fox, so Volkswagen Fox quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Lupo has
|
Volkswagen Fox has
| |