Volkswagen Lupo 1999 vs Peugeot 107 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 61 HP | 54 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 130 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 15.6 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Lupo is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Lupo engine produces 7 HP more power than Peugeot 107, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Peugeot 107. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Lupo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.0 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.0 l/100km | 4.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Lupo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Lupo consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 107, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Lupo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Lupo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 107. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 34 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Lupo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 107 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A2, Seat Arosa | Used also on Citroen C1 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Lupo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.53 m | 3.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
| Volkswagen Lupo is 10 cm longer than the Peugeot 107, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Lupo is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
830 litres | 751 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 9.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Lupo is 0.8 metres more than that of the Peugeot 107, which means Volkswagen Lupo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`210 kg | 1`245 kg | |
| Net weight: | 855 kg | 890 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 355 kg | 355 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Peugeot 107 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Lupo has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Peugeot 107, so Peugeot 107 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Lupo has
|
Peugeot 107 has
| |