Volkswagen Lupo 1999 vs Fiat Panda 1991

 
Volkswagen Lupo
1999 - 2005
Fiat Panda
1991 - 1999
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.2 Diesel1.1 Petrol
Diesel (Volkswagen Lupo) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Fiat Panda) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences."

Performance

Power: 61 HP50 HP
Torque: 140 NM83 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.5 seconds17.5 seconds
Volkswagen Lupo is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Lupo engine produces 11 HP more power than Fiat Panda, whereas torque is 57 NM more than Fiat Panda. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Lupo reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.06.6
The Volkswagen Lupo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Lupo consumes 3.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Panda, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Lupo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 540 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 34 litres40 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1130 km in combined cycle600 km in combined cycle
1250 km on highway710 km on highway
Volkswagen Lupo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.53 m3.41 m
Width: 1.62 m1.49 m
Height: 1.46 m1.42 m
Volkswagen Lupo is larger.
Volkswagen Lupo is 12 cm longer than the Fiat Panda, 13 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Lupo is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 130 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
830 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters9.5 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Lupo is 0.8 metres more than that of the Fiat Panda, which means Volkswagen Lupo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`210800
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

below average
Average price (€): 10001400
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Lupo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Fiat Panda has
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv