Volkswagen Lupo 1998 vs Volkswagen Polo 1995

 
Volkswagen Lupo
1998 - 2005
Volkswagen Polo
1995 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 50 HP60 HP
Torque: 86 NM116 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 17.7 seconds14.9 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Lupo engine produces 10 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Lupo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.66.5
Real fuel consumption: 6.4 l/100km6.9 l/100km
The Volkswagen Lupo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Lupo consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Lupo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Lupo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
Fuel tank capacity: 34 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 600 km in combined cycle690 km in combined cycle
730 km on highway880 km on highway
530 km with real consumption650 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.53 m3.72 m
Width: 1.64 m1.66 m
Height: 1.46 m1.42 m
Volkswagen Lupo is smaller, but slightly higher.
Volkswagen Lupo is 19 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Lupo is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 130 litres245 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
830 litres975 litres
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage space.
Volkswagen Lupo has 115 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 145 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10.1 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Lupo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo.
Gross weight (kg): 1`3401`400
Safety:
Quality:
high

high
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Lupo has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably better
Average price (€): 1200800
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Lupo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher safety
Volkswagen Polo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv