Volkswagen Lupo 1998 vs Volkswagen Fox 2005

 
Volkswagen Lupo
1998 - 2005
Volkswagen Fox
2005 - 2011
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 50 HP55 HP
Torque: 86 NM106 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 17.7 seconds18 seconds
Volkswagen Lupo engine produces 5 HP less power than Volkswagen Fox, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volkswagen Fox. Despite less power, Volkswagen Lupo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.66.0
Real fuel consumption: 6.4 l/100km6.8 l/100km
The Volkswagen Lupo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Lupo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Lupo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Lupo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox.
Fuel tank capacity: 34 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 600 km in combined cycle830 km in combined cycle
730 km on highway1000 km on highway
530 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Fox gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.53 m3.83 m
Width: 1.64 m1.66 m
Height: 1.46 m1.54 m
Volkswagen Lupo is smaller.
Volkswagen Lupo is 30 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Fox, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Lupo is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 130 litres260 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
830 litres1016 litres
Volkswagen Fox has more luggage space.
Volkswagen Lupo has 130 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Fox. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Fox (by 186 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Lupo is 1.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Fox, which means Volkswagen Lupo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`3401`480
Safety:
Quality:Volkswagen Fox has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Lupo has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Volkswagen Fox, so Volkswagen Fox quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 12002000
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Lupo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Volkswagen Fox has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv