Volkswagen Lupo 1998 vs Seat Arosa 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 HP | 50 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 NM | 86 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.7 seconds | 17.7 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Lupo and Seat Arosa have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
| By specification Volkswagen Lupo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Arosa, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Lupo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 34 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 740 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.53 m | 3.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Lupo is 2 cm shorter than the Seat Arosa, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 130 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 790 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`340 | 1`360 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Volkswagen Lupo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Arosa has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volkswagen Lupo, so Volkswagen Lupo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Lupo has
|
| |