Volkswagen Lupo 1998 vs Peugeot 107 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.4 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Volkswagen Lupo) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Peugeot 107) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 HP | 54 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 NM | 130 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.7 seconds | 15.6 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 107 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Lupo engine produces 4 HP less power than Peugeot 107, whereas torque is 44 NM less than Peugeot 107. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Lupo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 4.1 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 107 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Lupo consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 107, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Lupo could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Lupo consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 107. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 34 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 107 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 107 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volkswagen Polo, Seat Ibiza, Seat Arosa | Used also on Citroen C1 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.53 m | 3.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Volkswagen Lupo is larger, but slightly lower. Volkswagen Lupo is 10 cm longer than the Peugeot 107, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Lupo is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
830 litres | 751 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Lupo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Peugeot 107. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`340 kg | 1`245 kg | |
| Net weight: | 884 kg | 890 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 456 kg | 355 kg | |
| Volkswagen Lupo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem more than Peugeot 107. Therefore, Volkswagen Lupo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Peugeot 107 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Lupo has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Peugeot 107, so Peugeot 107 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Lupo has
|
Peugeot 107 has
| |