Volkswagen Lupo 1998 vs Peugeot 107 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.7 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 107 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Lupo engine produces 18 HP less power than Peugeot 107, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Peugeot 107. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Lupo reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 5.5 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 107 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Lupo consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 107, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Lupo could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Lupo consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 107. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 34 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 107 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Lupo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 22 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volkswagen Polo, Seat Ibiza, Seat Arosa | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Toyota Aygo, Peugeot 108 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 107 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Volkswagen Lupo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Peugeot 107 2005 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.53 m | 3.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Volkswagen Lupo is larger, but slightly lower. Volkswagen Lupo is 10 cm longer than the Peugeot 107, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Lupo is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
830 litres | 751 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Lupo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Peugeot 107. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`340 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Peugeot 107 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Lupo has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Peugeot 107, so Peugeot 107 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Lupo has
|
Peugeot 107 has
| |