Volkswagen Lupo 1998 vs Fiat Panda 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 HP | 54 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 NM | 88 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.7 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Fiat Panda is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Lupo engine produces 4 HP less power than Fiat Panda, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Fiat Panda. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Lupo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Lupo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Lupo consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Panda, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Lupo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Lupo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Panda. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 34 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Panda gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volkswagen Polo, Seat Ibiza, Seat Arosa | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Volkswagen Lupo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.53 m | 3.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.50 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Volkswagen Lupo is larger. Volkswagen Lupo is 12 cm longer than the Fiat Panda, 14 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Lupo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Lupo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Fiat Panda. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`340 | 800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Volkswagen Lupo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Panda has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Volkswagen Lupo, so Volkswagen Lupo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Lupo has
|
Fiat Panda has
| |