Volkswagen Lupo 1998 vs Fiat Panda 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 NM | 102 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.7 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Fiat Panda is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Lupo engine produces 10 HP less power than Fiat Panda, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Fiat Panda. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Lupo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 34 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.53 m | 3.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.58 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.54 m | |
| Volkswagen Lupo is 1 cm shorter than the Fiat Panda, 6 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Lupo is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Lupo is 0.7 metres more than that of the Fiat Panda, which means Volkswagen Lupo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`340 | 800 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Volkswagen Lupo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Panda has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Volkswagen Lupo, so Volkswagen Lupo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Lupo has
|
Fiat Panda has
| |