Volkswagen Lupo 1998 vs Volkswagen Polo 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.7 | 1.2 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 - 125 HP | 55 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 - 195 NM | 106 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 17.7 seconds | 10.7 - 17.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.0 - 7.5 | 4.5 - 7.4 | |
|
Volkswagen Lupo petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. On average, Volkswagen Lupo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.53 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Volkswagen Lupo is smaller. Volkswagen Lupo is 37 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
860 litres | 1030 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage space. Volkswagen Lupo has 140 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 170 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Lupo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`368 | ~ 1`530 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Lupo has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |