Volkswagen Golf 1986 vs Toyota Celica 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 143 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Golf engine produces 58 HP less power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 43 NM less than Toyota Celica. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 8.0 | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Golf consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Golf could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Volkswagen Golf is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen Golf is 67 cm shorter than the Toyota Celica, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.7 metres less than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Volkswagen Golf can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |