Volkswagen Golf 1980 vs Mazda 323 1989
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 HP | 56 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 NM | 110 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.8 seconds | 16.5 seconds | |
|
Mazda 323 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Golf engine produces 2 HP less power than Mazda 323, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Mazda 323. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 5.9 | |
|
The Mazda 323 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Golf could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.61 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Volkswagen Golf is smaller, but slightly higher. Volkswagen Golf is 18 cm shorter than the Mazda 323, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 309 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1102 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Golf has 61 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 323. The Mazda 323 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf has
|
Mazda 323 has
| |