Volkswagen Golf 1984 vs Volvo S40 2011
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 133 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Volvo S40 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Golf engine produces 45 HP less power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 137 NM less than Volvo S40. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 3.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo S40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Golf could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1360 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1480 km on highway | ||
| 1010 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo S40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo S40 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo S40 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from two 4x4 versions of Volvo S40 2011 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Volvo S40 2011 1.6 engine: The main issues reported by owners are frequent oil and coolant leaks. The Siemens fuel system with piezo injectors is highly sensitive to fuel quality, requiring the use of high-grade diesel to avoid ... More about Volvo S40 2011 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.98 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Volkswagen Golf is smaller. Volkswagen Golf is 50 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 345 litres | 404 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1145 litres | 883 litres | |
| Volkswagen Golf has 59 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 262 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volvo S40, which means Volkswagen Golf can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`430 | 1`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf has
|
Volvo S40 has
| |